<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BIA/Kelsey - Local Media Watch &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 19:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Marchex PSA: Small Businesses Lose Half a Billion Dollars Annually to Spam Calls</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2014/02/18/marchex-psa-small-businesses-lose-half-a-billion-dollars-annually-to-spam-calls/</link>
		<comments>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2014/02/18/marchex-psa-small-businesses-lose-half-a-billion-dollars-annually-to-spam-calls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Boland]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Call Monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online/Interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMBs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call monetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marchex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.biakelsey.com/?p=29168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Marchex has just released some intriguing stats that align with research we&#8217;re currently conducting for call monetization. Specifically, the company reports that SMBs lose half a billion dollars annually to a seldom-discussed problem: spam calls. As Marchex&#8217;s Ziad Ismail demonstrated&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2014/02/18/marchex-psa-small-businesses-lose-half-a-billion-dollars-annually-to-spam-calls/">Marchex PSA: Small Businesses Lose Half a Billion Dollars Annually to Spam Calls</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com">BIA/Kelsey - Local Media Watch</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://mma.multiview.com/userlogo/mma/3458785v3v1.jpg" width="338" height="168" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.marchex.com/" target="_blank">Marchex</a> has just <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/spam-phone-calls-cost-us-small-businesses-half-billion-dollars-in-lost-productivity-marchex-study-finds-2014-02-18?reflink=MW_news_stmp" target="_blank">released</a> some intriguing stats that align with research we&#8217;re currently conducting for call monetization. Specifically, the company reports that SMBs lose half a billion dollars annually to a seldom-discussed problem: spam calls.</p>
<p>As Marchex&#8217;s Ziad Ismail <a href="http://blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/12/17/at-leading-in-local-ilm-2013-focus-on-calls-the-real-local-currency/" target="_blank">demonstrated</a> at our December Leading in Local: Interactive Local Media conference, this can be telemarketers, robo-calls, or a newer form of &#8220;call fraud&#8221; that involves masked voices that keep a proprietor on the line for more than 30 seconds.</p>
<p>Why would they do that? So that SMBs get charged for that call under many pay-per-call platforms that charge advertisers for calls of a certain duration. This is parallel to what developed in the search world years ago for &#8220;click fraud.&#8221;</p>
<p>But unlike clicks, which don&#8217;t eat up SMBs&#8217; time, calls occupy time-strapped proprietors which results in real opportunity cost. In other words, time spent with telemarketers or giving directions is time away from revenue generating activity.</p>
<p>From our call monetization <a href="http://www.biakelsey.com/Company/Press-Releases/120618-Call-Based-Ad-Market-Poised-for-Explosive-Growth,-Driven-by-Mobile-Penetration-and-Advances-in-Call-Analytics.asp" target="_blank">white paper</a> last year (new edition underway):</p>
<blockquote><p><em>There is virtually no incremental cost to accepting more clicks, beyond the imperceptibly small increase in machine capacity and bandwidth. Bad telephone calls, however, are a tax on a business’ resources. These include solicitations, job seekers, mundane questions like directions and hours, service requests and misdials, to name a few. Bad calls waste time. Fortunes are made by those who find new ways to save people time.</em></p>
<p><em>The real issue with low-quality calls is the opportunity cost of missing a good customer. Imagine you run a small business. Four lines are ringing. One line is likely a new customer, but which one? Non-productive calls steal time from real paying customers. As call volumes increase with smartphone traffic, everyone is going to see an increase in dumb calls.</em></p>
<p><em>Big problems lead to big opportunities. For this reason, we will see an entirely new industry created around call analytics analysis to find, route and promote high-quality calls and their sources on one end of the spectrum. At the other will be the ability to demote and exclude calls that are non-productive. Call analytics will define the winners and losers in this new market.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This entire problem is underscored in light of the growth in call monetization. Mobile search and smartphone penetration are causing tech and media to world&#8217;s realize the opportunity to drive phone calls to SMBs (which they value).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.biakelsey.com/wp-content/uploads/1.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29184" alt="1" src="http://blog.biakelsey.com/wp-content/uploads/1.png" width="480" height="360" /></a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve reported that $68 billion is spent annually on advertising with the purpose of driving phone &#8212; a number that&#8217;s growing quickly in mobile media, given user intent and the inherent capability of the hardware to make phone calls.</p>
<p>But with this growth comes things like call spam, which has grown 162% in the past year. Companies like Marchex have <a href="http://blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/10/07/marchex-maps-call-monetizaiton-genome/#.UwQ63PldV8E" target="_blank">responded</a> with platforms that better gauge quality calls beyond just call duration and other traditional metrics.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re currently working on an update to the aforementioned white paper, given the emergence of activity around call monetization. We&#8217;ll revisit all of these opportunities and the current best practices and technologies in development. Stay tuned.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.biakelsey.com/wp-content/uploads/ScreenHunter_09-Feb.-18-20.44.jpg"><img class="alignnone  wp-image-29173" alt="ScreenHunter_09 Feb. 18 20.44" src="http://blog.biakelsey.com/wp-content/uploads/ScreenHunter_09-Feb.-18-20.44.jpg" width="376" height="409" /></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2014/02/18/marchex-psa-small-businesses-lose-half-a-billion-dollars-annually-to-spam-calls/">Marchex PSA: Small Businesses Lose Half a Billion Dollars Annually to Spam Calls</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com">BIA/Kelsey - Local Media Watch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2014/02/18/marchex-psa-small-businesses-lose-half-a-billion-dollars-annually-to-spam-calls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
