<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Commerce by the Numbers: Yelp&#8217;s &#8220;Local Coefficient&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/02/25/local-by-the-numbers-yelps-local-coefficient/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/02/25/local-by-the-numbers-yelps-local-coefficient/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Boland</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/02/25/local-by-the-numbers-yelps-local-coefficient/comment-page-1/#comment-1754859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Boland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=24650#comment-1754859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good question regarding the omission of other service verticals. I&#039;ll ask Yelp when i talk to them next week. I bet it was to keep this list somewhat unwieldy for the purposes of his editorial.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question regarding the omission of other service verticals. I&#8217;ll ask Yelp when i talk to them next week. I bet it was to keep this list somewhat unwieldy for the purposes of his editorial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Painters</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/02/25/local-by-the-numbers-yelps-local-coefficient/comment-page-1/#comment-1754641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Painters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=24650#comment-1754641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the link Mike, it makes a lot more sense now. 

Plus, I was way off with my guesses as to what the formula was!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Mike, it makes a lot more sense now. </p>
<p>Plus, I was way off with my guesses as to what the formula was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roswell Home Inspector</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/02/25/local-by-the-numbers-yelps-local-coefficient/comment-page-1/#comment-1754583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roswell Home Inspector]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=24650#comment-1754583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, 

Thanks for including the second link. 

It&#039;s interesting to see where they came up with the numbers for the &quot;plumber&quot;. Why didn&#039;t they include all of construction or service industries?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, </p>
<p>Thanks for including the second link. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see where they came up with the numbers for the &#8220;plumber&#8221;. Why didn&#8217;t they include all of construction or service industries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Boland</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/02/25/local-by-the-numbers-yelps-local-coefficient/comment-page-1/#comment-1754195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Boland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=24650#comment-1754195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great point. Rather than rehash the entire model, i just linked to the TechCrunch piece where all the elements to the formula are defined better. If you go to the following link, it explains it well. Maybe i&#039;ll add something additional to the post itself too. Thanks for pointing it out.

http://techcrunch.com/2013/02/24/brick-and-mortar-wins/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point. Rather than rehash the entire model, i just linked to the TechCrunch piece where all the elements to the formula are defined better. If you go to the following link, it explains it well. Maybe i&#8217;ll add something additional to the post itself too. Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/02/24/brick-and-mortar-wins/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2013/02/24/brick-and-mortar-wins/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Painters</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2013/02/25/local-by-the-numbers-yelps-local-coefficient/comment-page-1/#comment-1754194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Painters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=24650#comment-1754194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to help everyone fully understand this, it would be great to have a legend for the table.

My guess is that:
e =  ecommerce
t = ?
s = ?
L = Local
O = Online
M = Market Size

O*M = Total online market size
L*M = Total local market size

So in this does &quot;local&quot; include the non-online sales as well?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to help everyone fully understand this, it would be great to have a legend for the table.</p>
<p>My guess is that:<br />
e =  ecommerce<br />
t = ?<br />
s = ?<br />
L = Local<br />
O = Online<br />
M = Market Size</p>
<p>O*M = Total online market size<br />
L*M = Total local market size</p>
<p>So in this does &#8220;local&#8221; include the non-online sales as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
