<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NAA mediaXchange: NYT&#8217;s Nisenholtz Envisions a &#8216;Web of Managed Links&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2011/03/31/naa-mediaxchange-nyts-nisenholtz-envisions-a-web-of-managed-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2011/03/31/naa-mediaxchange-nyts-nisenholtz-envisions-a-web-of-managed-links/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Krasilovsky</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2011/03/31/naa-mediaxchange-nyts-nisenholtz-envisions-a-web-of-managed-links/comment-page-1/#comment-452374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krasilovsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=13967#comment-452374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times is a vital source for news junkies +; the paywall has been sensitively developed for 20 accesses, and I think it won&#039;t have a problem achieving premium revenue. The question I have is why multi channel access is $35 a month, compared to $15 for mobile OR IPad and Internet; and $10 for just Internet. The jump is a penalty that doesn&#039;t make sense to me. It is also interesting to note that Print subscriptions, which give unlimited access, aren&#039;t the centerpiece of this campaign. I guess their research shows that people just don&#039;t want a print paper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times is a vital source for news junkies +; the paywall has been sensitively developed for 20 accesses, and I think it won&#8217;t have a problem achieving premium revenue. The question I have is why multi channel access is $35 a month, compared to $15 for mobile OR IPad and Internet; and $10 for just Internet. The jump is a penalty that doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. It is also interesting to note that Print subscriptions, which give unlimited access, aren&#8217;t the centerpiece of this campaign. I guess their research shows that people just don&#8217;t want a print paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
