<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Groupon Better Off With Yahoo, Google (or on Its Own?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/11/19/is-groupon-better-off-with-yahoo-google-or-on-its-own/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/11/19/is-groupon-better-off-with-yahoo-google-or-on-its-own/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Krasilovsky</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/11/19/is-groupon-better-off-with-yahoo-google-or-on-its-own/comment-page-1/#comment-450558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krasilovsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=10365#comment-450558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Perry. I can argue both sides of that one.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Perry. I can argue both sides of that one&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/11/19/is-groupon-better-off-with-yahoo-google-or-on-its-own/comment-page-1/#comment-450528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=10365#comment-450528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s simple.  If they really believe in themselves, they would be a fool to sell right now. A service that is so uniquely branded and with near perfect access to capital and accelerated growth will suffer from a major challenge in the hands of someone as &quot;non-social&quot; as Google (ask @dens), or in such turmoil as Yahoo. 

If they sell it means that they don&#039;t believe they can live up to their own story. 

Ignore any other &quot;shareholder value&quot; or &quot;1+1=5&quot; b.s. It really is that simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simple.  If they really believe in themselves, they would be a fool to sell right now. A service that is so uniquely branded and with near perfect access to capital and accelerated growth will suffer from a major challenge in the hands of someone as &#8220;non-social&#8221; as Google (ask @dens), or in such turmoil as Yahoo. </p>
<p>If they sell it means that they don&#8217;t believe they can live up to their own story. </p>
<p>Ignore any other &#8220;shareholder value&#8221; or &#8220;1+1=5&#8243; b.s. It really is that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
