<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Gets More Place-Centric in Local Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/10/27/google-gets-more-place-centric-in-local-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/10/27/google-gets-more-place-centric-in-local-search-results/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Boland</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/10/27/google-gets-more-place-centric-in-local-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-449941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Boland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=9805#comment-449941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point. But look at the numbers: The commerce dept and census bureau report that e-commerce is only 3.8 percent of U.S. retail activity. The rest takes takes place offline in physical stores. 

So the larger opportunity is to focus on the 96 percent. And most of that is within a 15 mile radius of one&#039;s home (depending on urban vs. rural). So local results are important.

That said, your point is well taken for searches that reside further up the purchase funnel -- i.e. I&#039;m researching and comparing flat screen TVs... not looking to buy today. 

That comes down to the eternal challenge of Google inferring the correct intent based on your query -- ready to buy vs. researching. 

Geo modifiers help of course (&quot;flat screen, San Francisco&quot;), as do more granular terms (actual make and model number), that imply a certain progression down the funnel. 

certainly an interesting area as we all try to &quot;crack the code&quot;.

thanks for your comment
Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. But look at the numbers: The commerce dept and census bureau report that e-commerce is only 3.8 percent of U.S. retail activity. The rest takes takes place offline in physical stores. </p>
<p>So the larger opportunity is to focus on the 96 percent. And most of that is within a 15 mile radius of one&#8217;s home (depending on urban vs. rural). So local results are important.</p>
<p>That said, your point is well taken for searches that reside further up the purchase funnel &#8212; i.e. I&#8217;m researching and comparing flat screen TVs&#8230; not looking to buy today. </p>
<p>That comes down to the eternal challenge of Google inferring the correct intent based on your query &#8212; ready to buy vs. researching. </p>
<p>Geo modifiers help of course (&#8220;flat screen, San Francisco&#8221;), as do more granular terms (actual make and model number), that imply a certain progression down the funnel. </p>
<p>certainly an interesting area as we all try to &#8220;crack the code&#8221;.</p>
<p>thanks for your comment<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2010/10/27/google-gets-more-place-centric-in-local-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-449940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 14:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/?p=9805#comment-449940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More significant for me is the fact that we are seeing the Google Places listings dominate the results pages for generic non-geographic searches.

What Google needs to remember is that not every searcher is just looking to buy on the high street. What about purely online retailers and informational sites?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More significant for me is the fact that we are seeing the Google Places listings dominate the results pages for generic non-geographic searches.</p>
<p>What Google needs to remember is that not every searcher is just looking to buy on the high street. What about purely online retailers and informational sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
