<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Opt-In Effort Gives New Meaning to Self-Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rand</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/comment-page-1/#comment-413992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/#comment-413992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has re-surfaced as news in an article in the UK &quot;Daily Telegraph&quot;.

My response here: http://tinyurl.com/ygvstyj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has re-surfaced as news in an article in the UK &#8220;Daily Telegraph&#8221;.</p>
<p>My response here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ygvstyj" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ygvstyj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/comment-page-1/#comment-387635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Laughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/#comment-387635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Peter,
Thanks for adding some color to this. It appears as though 192.com&#039;s efforts might be better directed at improving their product. I just returned from the Association of Directory Publishers event here in the states, and opt out was high on the agenda. Real concern that this can get out of hand. Perhaps this will help ensure that opt out efforts are uniformly serious. My sense is the experience in Europe has generally been that serious opt out efforts do not seriously damage book possession and usage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,<br />
Thanks for adding some color to this. It appears as though 192.com&#8217;s efforts might be better directed at improving their product. I just returned from the Association of Directory Publishers event here in the states, and opt out was high on the agenda. Real concern that this can get out of hand. Perhaps this will help ensure that opt out efforts are uniformly serious. My sense is the experience in Europe has generally been that serious opt out efforts do not seriously damage book possession and usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rand</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/comment-page-1/#comment-387355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/#comment-387355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just spotted the freudian slip in the last post - for &quot;treed&quot;, read &quot;tried&quot;...

Have also responded on the 192.com blog about this but my thoughts seem to have disappeared into &quot;moderation&quot;. Hopefully they won&#039;t be too long in publishing..!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just spotted the freudian slip in the last post &#8211; for &#8220;treed&#8221;, read &#8220;tried&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Have also responded on the 192.com blog about this but my thoughts seem to have disappeared into &#8220;moderation&#8221;. Hopefully they won&#8217;t be too long in publishing..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rand</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/comment-page-1/#comment-387330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Rand]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/10/14/new-opt-in-effort-gives-new-meaning-to-self-service/#comment-387330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The campaign is not only self-serving, it contains inaccurate statements and inferences that there is no opt-out available - there is. And we, and other delivery companies, adhere to these requests.

192.com tried this once before, asking for an opt-out system, when publishers already had them in place.

The other key difference in 192.com&#039;s case is that they operate on a pay per search model. 

I just treed to find me - they can&#039;t find my number at all - but if I pay up for &quot;premium&quot; service I can access my electoral roll data and find out when I was born....

They can find my company - with two phone numbers, one of which is incorrect.

They can also find a local Photo processing company that has been out of business a number of years locally - really handy knowledge.

The old adage about glass houses and stone-throwing comes to mind!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The campaign is not only self-serving, it contains inaccurate statements and inferences that there is no opt-out available &#8211; there is. And we, and other delivery companies, adhere to these requests.</p>
<p>192.com tried this once before, asking for an opt-out system, when publishers already had them in place.</p>
<p>The other key difference in 192.com&#8217;s case is that they operate on a pay per search model. </p>
<p>I just treed to find me &#8211; they can&#8217;t find my number at all &#8211; but if I pay up for &#8220;premium&#8221; service I can access my electoral roll data and find out when I was born&#8230;.</p>
<p>They can find my company &#8211; with two phone numbers, one of which is incorrect.</p>
<p>They can also find a local Photo processing company that has been out of business a number of years locally &#8211; really handy knowledge.</p>
<p>The old adage about glass houses and stone-throwing comes to mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
