<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sales Debate at WMS &#8217;09: Interactive Specialist or Sell-It-All?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/05/22/the-sales-debate-at-wms-09-interactive-specialist-or-sell-it-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/05/22/the-sales-debate-at-wms-09-interactive-specialist-or-sell-it-all/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Larkin</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/05/22/the-sales-debate-at-wms-09-interactive-specialist-or-sell-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-357479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Larkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 01:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/05/22/the-sales-debate-at-wms-09-interactive-specialist-or-sell-it-all/#comment-357479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question really boils down to how sophisticated and how large the spend of interactive is relative to the traditional media sale.

It&#039;s relatively simple to tack on a low priced online product to a newspaper, Yellow Pages, radio, direct mail or television sale.

&quot;For X dollars more, we can extend the reach of your message with an online offering.&quot;

The trouble come up in a few circumstances:

1.  The sales cycle changes.  Biggest example is the annual print yellow pages sales canvass vs. the constant tweaking and hand-holding necessary with a promotional, higher priced, lead generation online program.

2.  Cannibalization of traditional media with the lure of the online.  It&#039;s real, it&#039;s devastating to traditional media revenues (ask AT&amp;T, Idearc, Dex and Yellow Book).

3.  Not only is the problem with the sales force not understanding the online products, but the advertisers don&#039;t understand them either.  Try explaining to a locksmith why he&#039;s not number one on Google for his primary key word phrase at all times.  From first hand experience,it&#039;s not pretty.

All that being said, here&#039;s today&#039;s sales lesson . . . 

&quot;Sell what people want to buy over and over.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question really boils down to how sophisticated and how large the spend of interactive is relative to the traditional media sale.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s relatively simple to tack on a low priced online product to a newspaper, Yellow Pages, radio, direct mail or television sale.</p>
<p>&#8220;For X dollars more, we can extend the reach of your message with an online offering.&#8221;</p>
<p>The trouble come up in a few circumstances:</p>
<p>1.  The sales cycle changes.  Biggest example is the annual print yellow pages sales canvass vs. the constant tweaking and hand-holding necessary with a promotional, higher priced, lead generation online program.</p>
<p>2.  Cannibalization of traditional media with the lure of the online.  It&#8217;s real, it&#8217;s devastating to traditional media revenues (ask AT&amp;T, Idearc, Dex and Yellow Book).</p>
<p>3.  Not only is the problem with the sales force not understanding the online products, but the advertisers don&#8217;t understand them either.  Try explaining to a locksmith why he&#8217;s not number one on Google for his primary key word phrase at all times.  From first hand experience,it&#8217;s not pretty.</p>
<p>All that being said, here&#8217;s today&#8217;s sales lesson . . . </p>
<p>&#8220;Sell what people want to buy over and over.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Taylor</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/05/22/the-sales-debate-at-wms-09-interactive-specialist-or-sell-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-357050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/05/22/the-sales-debate-at-wms-09-interactive-specialist-or-sell-it-all/#comment-357050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Multiproduct selling isn&#039;t so much about the products in sales reps&#039; portfolios, but how they approach creating a solution of products that meets or exceeds the advertiser&#039;s goals. Reps need to start with the end goal and work backward to create the right approach with their portfolio of products. As Neal pointed out, you can&#039;t go in with one product in mind and pound away at the advertiser until they buy that single product.

The art of discovery and understanding what makes a business successful has been lost with the overwhelming focus on product training or online platform certification. Advertisers want to know how all of the multitude of local media choices fit together to meet their goals and their budget. Splitting up the sale says to the advertiser that the reps do not understand the product and the company does not care to train them adequately so they can sell a full portfolio. Sure, two channels are better for the sales organization to manage, but additional sales calls are not convenient for the advertiser -- as so many of our Kelsey clients have discovered. If sales organizations can refocus on customers and their needs, rather than on features and benefits, multiproduct selling would be an easier proposition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiproduct selling isn&#8217;t so much about the products in sales reps&#8217; portfolios, but how they approach creating a solution of products that meets or exceeds the advertiser&#8217;s goals. Reps need to start with the end goal and work backward to create the right approach with their portfolio of products. As Neal pointed out, you can&#8217;t go in with one product in mind and pound away at the advertiser until they buy that single product.</p>
<p>The art of discovery and understanding what makes a business successful has been lost with the overwhelming focus on product training or online platform certification. Advertisers want to know how all of the multitude of local media choices fit together to meet their goals and their budget. Splitting up the sale says to the advertiser that the reps do not understand the product and the company does not care to train them adequately so they can sell a full portfolio. Sure, two channels are better for the sales organization to manage, but additional sales calls are not convenient for the advertiser &#8212; as so many of our Kelsey clients have discovered. If sales organizations can refocus on customers and their needs, rather than on features and benefits, multiproduct selling would be an easier proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
