<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Local Sites Target Rural, Exurban Populations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/04/29/more-local-sites-target-rural-exurban-populations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/04/29/more-local-sites-target-rural-exurban-populations/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Buerger</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/04/29/more-local-sites-target-rural-exurban-populations/comment-page-1/#comment-353228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Buerger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/04/29/more-local-sites-target-rural-exurban-populations/#comment-353228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While AmericanTowns.com does not specialize in &#8220;rural&#8221; sites, we do have experience with sites in thousands of towns with populations of 5,000 to 100,000 people.  That experience both affirms the issues raised by Peter and may indicate some solutions.

First, as indicated, national advertisers do want to reach these markets, but there can be a shortage of local media; these nationals also want to be seen as local, but be able to implement on national scale.  And yes, local residents do tend to know what new businesses have opened, so a business listings site may not add that much value beyond the yellow pages.

But rural communities are very active on a local level, and often exhibit high levels of civic energy.  As a result, we often see very high levels of household participation (10% and up) in our local sites for these communities, where people want to know what community activities are going on and to be part of them. In fact we are increasingly focusing on those towns where we have gotten the greatest local participation, which has actually helped our monthly traffic jump 50% during Q1.  And we see comparable community interest in newer &#8220;ex-urban&#8221; areas, even though some of the civic traditions aren&#8217;t as well established.  

With national scale to make good technology affordable on a per town basis and the ability for advertisers to pick exactly which town they want to advertise in, these smaller towns can be perfectly profitable for the publisher as well.  

(Peter, we&#8217;ll be releasing Q1 metrics next week, which should demonstrate much of the above.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While AmericanTowns.com does not specialize in &#8220;rural&#8221; sites, we do have experience with sites in thousands of towns with populations of 5,000 to 100,000 people.  That experience both affirms the issues raised by Peter and may indicate some solutions.</p>
<p>First, as indicated, national advertisers do want to reach these markets, but there can be a shortage of local media; these nationals also want to be seen as local, but be able to implement on national scale.  And yes, local residents do tend to know what new businesses have opened, so a business listings site may not add that much value beyond the yellow pages.</p>
<p>But rural communities are very active on a local level, and often exhibit high levels of civic energy.  As a result, we often see very high levels of household participation (10% and up) in our local sites for these communities, where people want to know what community activities are going on and to be part of them. In fact we are increasingly focusing on those towns where we have gotten the greatest local participation, which has actually helped our monthly traffic jump 50% during Q1.  And we see comparable community interest in newer &#8220;ex-urban&#8221; areas, even though some of the civic traditions aren&#8217;t as well established.  </p>
<p>With national scale to make good technology affordable on a per town basis and the ability for advertisers to pick exactly which town they want to advertise in, these smaller towns can be perfectly profitable for the publisher as well.  </p>
<p>(Peter, we&#8217;ll be releasing Q1 metrics next week, which should demonstrate much of the above.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Taylor</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/04/29/more-local-sites-target-rural-exurban-populations/comment-page-1/#comment-351621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/04/29/more-local-sites-target-rural-exurban-populations/#comment-351621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think one of the issues local merchants have with media is that it is too broad in its coverage to effectively serve their needs. If local search sites can fill this gap in a way that drives truly local leads and foot traffic then this could be a real growth market since competition would be more limited and targeted users might tend to be more loyal. I for one applaud this approach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the issues local merchants have with media is that it is too broad in its coverage to effectively serve their needs. If local search sites can fill this gap in a way that drives truly local leads and foot traffic then this could be a real growth market since competition would be more limited and targeted users might tend to be more loyal. I for one applaud this approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
