<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReachLocal Adds Display to Search Offering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/02/18/reachlocal-adds-display-to-search-offering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/02/18/reachlocal-adds-display-to-search-offering/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Margoly</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/02/18/reachlocal-adds-display-to-search-offering/comment-page-1/#comment-337128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Margoly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/02/18/reachlocal-adds-display-to-search-offering/#comment-337128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bigger question is why is a VC-backed company like Reachlocal focusing on OLD technologies? Where is their product offering for mobile devices?

I&#039;d be willing to bet that this really has more to do with the fact that, in a slowing economy, they needed a product offering that costs a lot less than their usual SEM campaigns in order to have ANY kind of revenue stream at all.

Bottom line: a VC-backed company should be at the forefront of NEW technologies and product offerings, not coming late to the same-old products that have been around for years. Otherwise, how DO they plan to differentiate themselves from their very real competition?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bigger question is why is a VC-backed company like Reachlocal focusing on OLD technologies? Where is their product offering for mobile devices?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be willing to bet that this really has more to do with the fact that, in a slowing economy, they needed a product offering that costs a lot less than their usual SEM campaigns in order to have ANY kind of revenue stream at all.</p>
<p>Bottom line: a VC-backed company should be at the forefront of NEW technologies and product offerings, not coming late to the same-old products that have been around for years. Otherwise, how DO they plan to differentiate themselves from their very real competition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Krasilovsky</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/02/18/reachlocal-adds-display-to-search-offering/comment-page-1/#comment-336245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Krasilovsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/02/18/reachlocal-adds-display-to-search-offering/#comment-336245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(This came in from Steven Johnson)

I get why ReachLocal wants to leverage its sales force -- but making this move, at this point also means they probably are running out of SEM steam.  

There simply are not infinite Google clicks to re-sell, especially when you and other re-sellers are essentially bidding each other up (so much for margins).

Good luck to Reach on this effort.  They enter a very crowded sales field -- and offering one order, one bill &quot;ease&quot; is not as much of an advantage here or all the existing local sales networks would be doing better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(This came in from Steven Johnson)</p>
<p>I get why ReachLocal wants to leverage its sales force &#8212; but making this move, at this point also means they probably are running out of SEM steam.  </p>
<p>There simply are not infinite Google clicks to re-sell, especially when you and other re-sellers are essentially bidding each other up (so much for margins).</p>
<p>Good luck to Reach on this effort.  They enter a very crowded sales field &#8212; and offering one order, one bill &#8220;ease&#8221; is not as much of an advantage here or all the existing local sales networks would be doing better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
