<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angie Hicks at Online Marketing Summit: &#8216;We&#8217;re Direct Marketers&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/02/05/angie-hicks-at-online-marketing-summit-were-direct-marketers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/02/05/angie-hicks-at-online-marketing-summit-were-direct-marketers/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Murphhy</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2009/02/05/angie-hicks-at-online-marketing-summit-were-direct-marketers/comment-page-1/#comment-386293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Murphhy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2009/02/05/angie-hicks-at-online-marketing-summit-were-direct-marketers/#comment-386293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angie&#039;s List - not always fair or accurate!
I need some wide spread Good Press to counter the bogus press on Angie&#8217;s List.
In my experienced opinion, Angie&#8217;s List is lousy at providing useful or accurate information on their popular website.  They allow users to post information without verification.  Blatant lies can only be refuted by service providers in a manner that is ineffective and makes the service provider sound like a whiner and excuse maker.  Also, it is easy for an unscrupulous person to post made up reviews to slam a good competitor.  Why would this be the case for a company that purports to be a facilitator of good information to help consumers make informed decisions?  Follow the money!  Angie is making lot&#8217;s money by both selling subscriptions to home owners and advertising to service providers.  Is she getting her bread buttered on both sides?
How do I know?  I am a victim of the Angie&#8217;s List scam.  My company, while not perfect, has completed 100% of our contract obligations (over 3000) for 100% of it&#8217;s clients (over 1200) in over 26 years of business.  Has some of our staff made some mistakes and at times lacked judgment?  Of course they have, as it happens on occasion in every company that has staff and clients.   What I do promise is that we always have and will finish every project in a way that is fair if not in our normal exceptional fashion.  
My company has only 4 Angie&#8217;s List reviews and all happen to be C/D in ratings and two of those ratings are by someone who was never a client.  That poster just said that they called us and didn&#8217;t like what they were told.  As this alleged caller, never left any contact information with us (name or phone number) it is impossible for us to respond to intelligently.  Another poster says we charged her too much on a project that we under charged her by 40% of the market rate.  The 3rd poster was a real client whom posted in the middle of her kitchen remodel at the normal point of maximum discomfort.  While we understand the emotional rollercoaster of most remodeling clients we feel she was unfair in not following up with how the job finished.  We also have written proof of the inaccuracies of her allegations but didn&#8217;t feel it worth the expense to pursue a law suit to get her to get her facts right, maybe we are wrong in that conclusion.  Regardless, this same owner has had no problem having us come back 3-4 years later to fix some minor paint issues under warranty or hiring us to do additional work for her.  For some reason she has not given us good feedback on the additional work she hired us for &#8211; I guess that she can&#8217;t do it after she decided that it was not worth continuing to be an Angie&#8217;s List Subscriber.
When I complained about this situation to the staff at Angie&#8217;s List, the best answer that they would offer was for me to recruit my good clients to join Angie&#8217;s List to post good reviews so that our happy clients posts could overwhelm the one&#8217;s that were not so good.  I have a HUGE problem with this being the right or a good solution. Am I alone in this thinking or do I just smell something fishy!  In my book Angie&#8217;s List rates an &#8220;F&#8221; for posting unfair feedbacks and providing a blackmail response to my complaint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie&#8217;s List &#8211; not always fair or accurate!<br />
I need some wide spread Good Press to counter the bogus press on Angie&#8217;s List.<br />
In my experienced opinion, Angie&#8217;s List is lousy at providing useful or accurate information on their popular website.  They allow users to post information without verification.  Blatant lies can only be refuted by service providers in a manner that is ineffective and makes the service provider sound like a whiner and excuse maker.  Also, it is easy for an unscrupulous person to post made up reviews to slam a good competitor.  Why would this be the case for a company that purports to be a facilitator of good information to help consumers make informed decisions?  Follow the money!  Angie is making lot&#8217;s money by both selling subscriptions to home owners and advertising to service providers.  Is she getting her bread buttered on both sides?<br />
How do I know?  I am a victim of the Angie&#8217;s List scam.  My company, while not perfect, has completed 100% of our contract obligations (over 3000) for 100% of it&#8217;s clients (over 1200) in over 26 years of business.  Has some of our staff made some mistakes and at times lacked judgment?  Of course they have, as it happens on occasion in every company that has staff and clients.   What I do promise is that we always have and will finish every project in a way that is fair if not in our normal exceptional fashion.<br />
My company has only 4 Angie&#8217;s List reviews and all happen to be C/D in ratings and two of those ratings are by someone who was never a client.  That poster just said that they called us and didn&#8217;t like what they were told.  As this alleged caller, never left any contact information with us (name or phone number) it is impossible for us to respond to intelligently.  Another poster says we charged her too much on a project that we under charged her by 40% of the market rate.  The 3rd poster was a real client whom posted in the middle of her kitchen remodel at the normal point of maximum discomfort.  While we understand the emotional rollercoaster of most remodeling clients we feel she was unfair in not following up with how the job finished.  We also have written proof of the inaccuracies of her allegations but didn&#8217;t feel it worth the expense to pursue a law suit to get her to get her facts right, maybe we are wrong in that conclusion.  Regardless, this same owner has had no problem having us come back 3-4 years later to fix some minor paint issues under warranty or hiring us to do additional work for her.  For some reason she has not given us good feedback on the additional work she hired us for &#8211; I guess that she can&#8217;t do it after she decided that it was not worth continuing to be an Angie&#8217;s List Subscriber.<br />
When I complained about this situation to the staff at Angie&#8217;s List, the best answer that they would offer was for me to recruit my good clients to join Angie&#8217;s List to post good reviews so that our happy clients posts could overwhelm the one&#8217;s that were not so good.  I have a HUGE problem with this being the right or a good solution. Am I alone in this thinking or do I just smell something fishy!  In my book Angie&#8217;s List rates an &#8220;F&#8221; for posting unfair feedbacks and providing a blackmail response to my complaint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
