<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook and the Marriage of Classifieds, Social Networking and Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2007/08/08/facebook-and-the-marriage-of-classifieds-social-networking-and-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2007/08/08/facebook-and-the-marriage-of-classifieds-social-networking-and-video/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Boland</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2007/08/08/facebook-and-the-marriage-of-classifieds-social-networking-and-video/comment-page-1/#comment-26034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Boland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2007/08/08/facebook-and-the-marriage-of-classifieds-social-networking-and-video/#comment-26034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much for your comments Perry. You are right that &quot;partnerships&quot; is the wrong way to put this. Generally speaking i see Facebook apps as a sort of partnership with every company that decides to build one. But it isn&#039;t a partnership in the traditional sense and i should avoid causing this confusion. I&#039;ve changed the post accordingly and apologize for any confusion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for your comments Perry. You are right that &#8220;partnerships&#8221; is the wrong way to put this. Generally speaking i see Facebook apps as a sort of partnership with every company that decides to build one. But it isn&#8217;t a partnership in the traditional sense and i should avoid causing this confusion. I&#8217;ve changed the post accordingly and apologize for any confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2007/08/08/facebook-and-the-marriage-of-classifieds-social-networking-and-video/comment-page-1/#comment-25160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kelseygroup.com/index.php/2007/08/08/facebook-and-the-marriage-of-classifieds-social-networking-and-video/#comment-25160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your article is slightly misleading, claiming that there is a &#039;partnership&#039; between Facebook and buy.com. In fact, buy.com have simply made a Facebook application - they don&#039;t appear to have any direct commerical relationship with Facebook, any more than any other Facebook app developer has.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is slightly misleading, claiming that there is a &#8216;partnership&#8217; between Facebook and buy.com. In fact, buy.com have simply made a Facebook application &#8211; they don&#8217;t appear to have any direct commerical relationship with Facebook, any more than any other Facebook app developer has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
