Google Expands Newspaper Pilot Program

Summary

As expected, Google has expanded its newspaper ad pilot program and has made it easier and more visible to AdWords advertisers. The program has shown success, as we noted back in December, and represents one of the many flanks in Google’s march toward covering all media and all formats. The latter charge was emboldened by its DoubleClick acquisition (still facing congressional antitrust scrutiny), and various media continue to be brought into the fold through partnerships such as ClearChannel (radio). The newspaper effort specifically launched to resell print ads across 50 U.S. papers and has now been extended to 250. We expect more to follow.

Analysis

Newspapers with falling ad revenues will likely accept Google’s new source of ad dollars whole-heartedly, while some advertisers will appreciate the invitation to advertise in a print medium, previously out of reach. The effort specifically chops up full-page ads into smaller ads that are more affordable for a subset of businesses that might have had a long-standing desire to advertise in print but couldn’t afford it.

Newspapers, meanwhile, have always had the capability to do this, but from a sales channel perspective, it isn’t as attractive (opportunity cost) to go after a fragmented base of smaller businesses interested in smaller ad spends. Sales reps instead devote their attention to the car dealers, furniture showrooms and big-box retailers of the world.

Google’s self-provisioning ad campaign setup, on the other hand, makes this possible and essentially adds a sales channel for newspapers, albeit inferior to their own physical sales asset (an important and core strength, like Yellow Pages). Regardless, it opens up a new addressable market segment to newspapers at a time when they need it most.

Indeed, headlines of newspaper publishers’ woes continue unabated. The latest is Tribune Co.’s statements this week that the Los Angeles Times experienced one of its “worst quarters ever” in ad revenues and cash flow.

New Advertisers: For Better or Worse

The chopped-up ad revenues, however, could present a slight downside for newspapers that tie up with Google’s effort. Creating these affordable chunks of inventory essentially breaks up whole-page ads into a patchwork of smaller ads, characteristic of the pages that fill smaller free metro papers or readers.

Some papers could feel this will open the floodgates to questionable advertising or an overall look and feel that is below their level of “class.” However, the terms of the “bid-ask” marketplace allow publishers to accept the ads before they are sold. And overall, the positives outweigh these drawbacks in that this has proved to be a great way to dynamically place remnant inventory late in the publishing cycle, which is otherwise backfilled with house ads. In any case, newspapers aren’t really in a position to be turning away advertising.

In addition, Google is hoping this conversely adds appeal to AdWords and gets advertisers to use Google Analytics more often. These elements all tie together nicely if you think about it: Google Analytics can be used to arm advertisers with the knowledge of certain geographies that could use a boost in sales, and a corresponding print budget allocation. We’ll see what else comes of it. But for now the effort makes a lot of sense.

Meanwhile, Yahoo! continues to develop its “amigos” newspaper consortium. Though it similarly makes inroads to the newspaper world, this setup is much different from Google’s effort. Yahoo!’s efforts instead live entirely online and will work toward beefing up its own content across its network (Yahoo! News, HotJobs etc.) with newspaper content, while conversely providing newspaper publishers much-needed online functionality, technology assistance and online know-how. We’re also bullish on this effort and will continue to watch closely.
__________

Related TKG Reports: White Paper: Newspapers 2.0 Part 4: Building Online Newspapers in a Web 2.0 World, Advisory: Newspapers Team Up Online To Nab National Advertisers

Mike Boland

Mike Boland is an analyst with the Kelsey Group.

This Post Has 401 Comments

  1. Pingback: When the Web is a Small Business’s Enemy, pt. III

  2. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Seattle Smackdown: The PI Bites Back

  3. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » On How Many Sites Do SMB Advertise?

  4. Pingback: Small Businesses Advertising Online put Eggs in One Basket at Ghost of Midnight

  5. Pingback: [WdYt:] RepairPal « Psssst….you SNOOZE you LOSE.

  6. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Jivox Raises $10 Million

  7. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » TKG Data and Analysis: A Weekly Recap

  8. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Agendize Releases Video API

  9. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Local.com Adds Reviews

  10. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » The SMB Video Opportunity: A Conversation with AdFare

  11. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » TKG Data and Analysis: A Weekly Recap

  12. Pingback: evite | edvdbox

  13. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Location Awareness: It’s Not Just for Mobile

  14. Pingback: G5 Search Marketing » Blog Archive » Local Video Market to Reach $1.5 Billion by 2012

  15. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » New Data From Palore: Top States for Local Reviews

  16. Pingback: Panic {RE}_Programming » Blog Archive » Digging Deeper::Online Video Ads Finally Find Their Niche

  17. Pingback: The Local Onliner » Stepup Alum Launches DriverSide, a Car Maintenance Site

  18. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Stepup Alum Launches DriverSide, a Car Maintenance Site

  19. Pingback: links for 2008-06-27 « David Black

  20. Pingback: Infoserve Blog » Blog Archive » How are people searching?

  21. Pingback: Electron Blog » Blog Archive » Local Online Video Advertising Market to Reach $1.5B by 2012, says Kelsey Group

  22. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » TKG Data and Analysis: A Weekly Recap

  23. Pingback: Local Online Video Market to Reach $1.5B by 2012 | Video Contest Clearinghouse - Video Competition Opportunities

  24. Pingback: Randy Weber » Blog Archive » This Was Dumb When It Was Cue Cat and It’s Dumb Now

  25. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Local.com Pushes Display Ads for Brand Marketers

  26. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Digg Gets More Social

  27. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » AskCity Drops Maps, Outsources to MSFT

  28. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Google Launches Voice Search for Mobile Maps

  29. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Merchant Circle Forms Distribution Deal with Yahoo!

  30. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » YouTube: Helping or Hurting Online Video Quality

  31. Pingback: Lost Remote » Report: Gannett buying ShopLocal outright

  32. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » TKG Data and Analysis: A Weekly Recap

  33. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Whither the Weather?

  34. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Let the iPhone Frenzy Begin

  35. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » TKG Data and Analysis: A Weekly Recap

  36. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Local.com Launches “Best Of” Program

  37. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » TKG Data and Analysis: A Weekly Recap

  38. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Zvents Brings Paul Levine “On Board”

  39. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Signs of Google Social Search Emerge

  40. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Will Social be the Killer App for Mobile: Part II

  41. Pingback: What’s Wrong with Local Search Sites

  42. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » What Role will IYPs Play in Next Generation Mobile Search?

  43. Pingback: Industry News - July 17, 2008 | LocalPoint - Perspectives on the Local Internet

  44. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » After One Week, Lots of Volatility for Local iPhone Apps

  45. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » TKG Data and Analysis: A Weekly Recap

  46. Pingback: Shaping Youth » Free for the Asking: ChaCha Answers, Texted to Your Phone

  47. Pingback: NY Times Goes After SMB Market via AdReady « AdReady

  48. Pingback: Beyond Search is Suggestion

  49. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Google Maps Adds Walking Directions: iPhone Next?

  50. Pingback: Kelsey Group Blogs » Product Placement Comes Closer into Focus: Part III

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>