<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dex Usage and Sales Strategy Seems to Have Paid Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2007/02/16/dex-usage-and-sales-strategy-seems-to-have-paid-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2007/02/16/dex-usage-and-sales-strategy-seems-to-have-paid-off/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: k</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2007/02/16/dex-usage-and-sales-strategy-seems-to-have-paid-off/comment-page-1/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, the larger story is Dex emulating a classic &quot;independent&quot; sales strategy to steal market share from...the  independent!? Or reverting to coupons (!?) to generate consumer interest and usage? What all this really means but doesn&#146;t say is that in most markets the incumbent and independent will continue to duke it out for revenue and market share over both a declining base of disinterested, unmotivated advertisers and disengaged users. For investors and executive level managers the question is how does this strategy help to sustain the traditionally fat incumbent print YP margins? The answer is: it doesn&#146;t.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the larger story is Dex emulating a classic &amp;quot;independent&amp;quot; sales strategy to steal market share from&#8230;the  independent!? Or reverting to coupons (!?) to generate consumer interest and usage? What all this really means but doesn&amp;#146;t say is that in most markets the incumbent and independent will continue to duke it out for revenue and market share over both a declining base of disinterested, unmotivated advertisers and disengaged users. For investors and executive level managers the question is how does this strategy help to sustain the traditionally fat incumbent print YP margins? The answer is: it doesn&amp;#146;t.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
