<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outside.in Head Talks &#8217;Place Blogs&#8217; (and More)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2006/11/12/outsidein-head-talks-place-blogs-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2006/11/12/outsidein-head-talks-place-blogs-and-more/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Myers</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2006/11/12/outsidein-head-talks-place-blogs-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven&#146;s &quot;long tail&quot; comment seems to presume that we &quot;hyper-local&quot; bloggers are at it to make revenue. At the risk of sounding hopelessly stuck in the early 90&#146;s, I&#146;ll point out that my blog   &lt;a href=&quot;http://multnomahvillager.blogspot.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Multnomah Villager&lt;/a&gt; is something that I maintain as a side project and not as a potential career. I agree that this approach relegates one to the 100-hits a week level. I have a few issues with the necessity for &quot;aggregators&quot;. While I appreciate any traffic they send my way (especially since I recently added Google Ads - how&#146;s that for invalidating my earlier statement about revenue?), I&#146;m not so sure that the presence of aggregators makes local blogs or content easier to find.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My search performace on Google is enough - why search to find an aggregator when a Google search for the content itself will do? The use of the META ICBM tags helps with my serach performance as well. I really like outside.in&#146;s Google maps integration, and how it change the focus area of the content, but I will wait to see whether or not building additional content links alongside the &#146;blogs results in something more than a Web 2.0 version of Citysearch. That may not be a bad thing....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I&#146;m not crazy about sites making ad revenue off of displaying my content, but like I said, I&#146;m not in this for a living, so I&#146;m not getting all hot and bothered about that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven&amp;#146;s &amp;quot;long tail&amp;quot; comment seems to presume that we &amp;quot;hyper-local&amp;quot; bloggers are at it to make revenue. At the risk of sounding hopelessly stuck in the early 90&amp;#146;s, I&amp;#146;ll point out that my blog   <a href=&quot;http://multnomahvillager.blogspot.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;>The Multnomah Villager</a> is something that I maintain as a side project and not as a potential career. I agree that this approach relegates one to the 100-hits a week level. I have a few issues with the necessity for &amp;quot;aggregators&amp;quot;. While I appreciate any traffic they send my way (especially since I recently added Google Ads &#8211; how&amp;#146;s that for invalidating my earlier statement about revenue?), I&amp;#146;m not so sure that the presence of aggregators makes local blogs or content easier to find.</p>
<p>My search performace on Google is enough &#8211; why search to find an aggregator when a Google search for the content itself will do? The use of the META ICBM tags helps with my serach performance as well. I really like outside.in&amp;#146;s Google maps integration, and how it change the focus area of the content, but I will wait to see whether or not building additional content links alongside the &amp;#146;blogs results in something more than a Web 2.0 version of Citysearch. That may not be a bad thing&#8230;.</p>
<p>And I&amp;#146;m not crazy about sites making ad revenue off of displaying my content, but like I said, I&amp;#146;m not in this for a living, so I&amp;#146;m not getting all hot and bothered about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
