<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop Whining</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2006/05/22/Stop-Whining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2006/05/22/Stop-Whining/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2006/05/22/Stop-Whining/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the idea in principal but The NYT would NEVER have the courage to do that.  If I owned them, I wouldn&#146;t but it is that type of thinking that will help them get by.  WSJ put same guy in charge of print and electronic...that is gutsy enough for print pubs that make good money today.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea in principal but The NYT would NEVER have the courage to do that.  If I owned them, I wouldn&amp;#146;t but it is that type of thinking that will help them get by.  WSJ put same guy in charge of print and electronic&#8230;that is gutsy enough for print pubs that make good money today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2006/05/22/Stop-Whining/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the NYT follow Jim Cramers suggestion, as outlined in New York Magazine: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;There&apos;s one way out of this mess for the Times. It is a bold, gutsy, and, some would say, foolish way, at least initially: The Times—here&apos;s the irony—should go all-digital. That&apos;s right. It should abandon newsprint and force everyone to the Web. It should make a stand against Google, using its About.com division—something with real growth, and which is actually working out despite the $410 million in debt taken down to buy the thing—to lead the way. Maybe it should even take the revolutionary step of blocking Google from accessing its content, something no one else is willing to do. Or maybe it should at least say, &quot;This is the deal: You want our stuff, you must share much more with us than you are willing to share with others.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.nymetro.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the NYT follow Jim Cramers suggestion, as outlined in New York Magazine: </p>
<p>&amp;quot;There&apos;s one way out of this mess for the Times. It is a bold, gutsy, and, some would say, foolish way, at least initially: The Times—here&apos;s the irony—should go all-digital. That&apos;s right. It should abandon newsprint and force everyone to the Web. It should make a stand against Google, using its About.com division—something with real growth, and which is actually working out despite the $410 million in debt taken down to buy the thing—to lead the way. Maybe it should even take the revolutionary step of blocking Google from accessing its content, something no one else is willing to do. Or maybe it should at least say, &quot;This is the deal: You want our stuff, you must share much more with us than you are willing to share with others.&quot;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nymetro.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nymetro.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
