<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AccuWeather the Beginning of Google Local Search Syndication?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/04/23/AccuWeather-the-Beginning-of-Google-Local-Search-Syndication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/04/23/AccuWeather-the-Beginning-of-Google-Local-Search-Syndication/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/04/23/AccuWeather-the-Beginning-of-Google-Local-Search-Syndication/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fair enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOCAL IYP Guy</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/04/23/AccuWeather-the-Beginning-of-Google-Local-Search-Syndication/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LOCAL IYP Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You make it sound like this is some new trend.  IYP has been syndicating local search boxes for more than 7 or 8 years.  Infospace has been built on syndication.  I find it odd to see explained as if it&apos;s a new trend using Google and Interchange as the pioneers. To me, this is a complete non-event.  Of course Google will copy the obvious strategies of syndication and distribution. Not everything Google does is original or &quot;shake in our boots&quot; meaningful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make it sound like this is some new trend.  IYP has been syndicating local search boxes for more than 7 or 8 years.  Infospace has been built on syndication.  I find it odd to see explained as if it&apos;s a new trend using Google and Interchange as the pioneers. To me, this is a complete non-event.  Of course Google will copy the obvious strategies of syndication and distribution. Not everything Google does is original or &quot;shake in our boots&quot; meaningful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/04/23/AccuWeather-the-Beginning-of-Google-Local-Search-Syndication/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just re-read and I don&apos;t think there&apos;s any suggestion that you should &quot;shake in your boots.&quot; It&apos;s just an analysis of how Google&apos;s Local Seach strategy is evolving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just re-read and I don&apos;t think there&apos;s any suggestion that you should &quot;shake in your boots.&quot; It&apos;s just an analysis of how Google&apos;s Local Seach strategy is evolving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
