<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SBC Takes Aim at Competitors in New Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/03/11/SBC-Takes-Aim-at-Competitors-in-New-Ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/03/11/SBC-Takes-Aim-at-Competitors-in-New-Ads/</link>
	<description>LOCAL MEDIA WATCH. The Nexus of All Things Local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:23:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/03/11/SBC-Takes-Aim-at-Competitors-in-New-Ads/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shouldn&apos;t the industry be focused on promoting Yellow Pages as a consumer medium rather than &quot;dissing&quot; each other. 

The AdWeek article, based on what you described, seems to take for granted that consumers have a favorable view of the print product. That may not be as true today as it was even a few years ago. And the intensity of competition may be indirectly making that worse. 

I think they need to restore some confidence in the product itself as a valuable source of local business information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&apos;t the industry be focused on promoting Yellow Pages as a consumer medium rather than &quot;dissing&quot; each other. </p>
<p>The AdWeek article, based on what you described, seems to take for granted that consumers have a favorable view of the print product. That may not be as true today as it was even a few years ago. And the intensity of competition may be indirectly making that worse. </p>
<p>I think they need to restore some confidence in the product itself as a valuable source of local business information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://staging.blog.biakelsey.com/index.php/2005/03/11/SBC-Takes-Aim-at-Competitors-in-New-Ads/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Laughlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that the industry is better served by promoting the category than promoting a brand and the expense of another. As I read the comments made in the article, and perhaps did not convey effectively, was that a key assumption driving the creative is that consumers once had a favorable view of the printed product, and that view needed to be re-inforced, if not restored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the industry is better served by promoting the category than promoting a brand and the expense of another. As I read the comments made in the article, and perhaps did not convey effectively, was that a key assumption driving the creative is that consumers once had a favorable view of the printed product, and that view needed to be re-inforced, if not restored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
